Annabelle Xu vs Lan Mi Head-to-Head Stats, Results & Performance Comparison

Wojtek Kolan

Wojtek Kolan

Published on 10 Jun at 06:11 AM UTC

HEAD TO HEAD

A. Xu vs L. Mi

Annabelle Xu
Annabelle Xu

Flag CAN CAN

w
w
w
l
l
l
l
w
w
l
Lan Mi
Lan Mi

Flag CHN CHN

l
w
l
l
w
w
l
w
l
l

1

Win

1

Played

0

Win

21
Age
21
-
Height
-
0
C. Rank
789
0
Best Rank
776
0
Total Titles
0
0
YTD Titles
0
$0
Career Money
$0
-
Plays
-

Head-to-head: Xu 1 - 0 Mi

They have played 3 sets in total, with Annabelle Xu winning 2 and Lan Mi winning 1. The last match between Annabelle Xu and Lan Mi was at the W35 Santo Domingo, 10-06-2025, Round: R1, Surface: Hard, with Annabelle Xu getting the victory 2-6 6-1 6-0.

PlayersHead To Head Match Wins
Xu1
Mi0
Last 1 H2H Matches:

(R1W35 Santo Domingo(06-10-25)

Hard
CAN Flag
Annabelle Xu
2
6
6
CHN Flag
Lan Mi
6
1
0

A. Xu vs L. Mi H2H Profile

Stats
$0Career Prize Money$0
51.02% (25-24)Career Total W/L58.06% (36-26)
1Hard0
1Total H2H Matches0
0% (0-0)YTD Win/Loss0% (0-0)

A. Xu vs L. Mi Match Preview:

  • Xu's recent second serve points won is 39.6%, while Mi's is slightly better at 42.37%. Could this give Mi a serving edge?
  • Both players are nearly equal in returning their opponent's second serve, with Xu at 53.07% and Mi at 53.4%.
  • Mi performs better in returning first serves, with a success rate of 38.31% compared to Xu's 35.36%.
  • Under pressure, Xu has saved 43.66% of breakpoints, whereas Mi has saved only 25.64%, indicating Xu is more resilient in tight situations.
  • Over the past year, Xu has a win rate of 50%, slightly higher than Mi's 46.67%. Does Xu have a reliability edge?
  • Both players excel on hard courts; however, Mi has a superior win rate of 67% against Xu's 54% on this surface.
  • Xu and Mi have both won 50% of their matches at the Challenger/ITF > $10K level in the last year, making them evenly matched in this tier.
  • Xu has faced tougher competition on average, with opponents ranked 302.63, against Mi's average of 441.73, potentially making Xu more battle-tested.
  • In deciding set scenarios, Mi has fared better, winning 33% compared to Xu's 0%, suggesting Mi might handle pressure in final sets more effectively.
  • Mi's breakpoint conversion rate is 60.87%, significantly higher than Xu's 32.26%, pointing to Mi's effectiveness in critical moments.

Editorial Prediction (June 10, 2025, UTC):

Xu and Mi both demonstrate unique strengths and challenges. Xu tends to perform well under pressure, saving a higher percentage of breakpoints compared to Mi. This trait often becomes crucial in close matchups.

However, Mi's superior performance on hard courts, combined with better second serve points won, forebodes a potential advantage in rallies starting with a serve. Additionally, Mi's impressive breakpoint conversion suggests that she can capitalize on crucial opportunities during matches.

While Xu has shown resilience against higher-ranked opponents, Mi's skill in deciding sets and efficient return game might give her the upper hand in high-stakes moments. Considering these aspects, Mi appears to have a slight edge in this contest.

Based on current performance metrics and historical context, Mi is the most likely to clinch the upcoming tennis match.

Annabelle Xu vs Lan Mi Editorial Preview By TennisTipster88.

A. Xu vs L. Mi H2H Stats Used In Our Predictions

Stats
1H2H Matches Won0
2Sets Won1
14Games Won7
5Aces (Total)0
3Total Double Faults1
1:57:25Average Match Time1:57:25
60% (38/63)1st Serve %88% (56/64)
63% (24/38)1st Serve Win %43% (24/56)
48% (12/25)2nd Serve Win %38% (3/8)
54% (7/13)Break Pts Won %67% (4/6)
58% (37/64)Return Points Win %43% (27/63)
100% (1/1)Best‑of‑3 Win %0% (0/1)
100% (1/1)Deciding Set Win %0% (0/1)
0% (0/0)1st Set Won, Won Match0% (0/1)
0% (0/0)1st Set Won, Lost Match100% (1/1)
100% (1/1)1st Set Lost, Won Match0% (0/0)

Recent Performance Stats

2nd Serve Win %: Xu 42%, Mi 42%.
Opp 2nd Serve Pts Won: Xu 55%, Mi 58%.
Break Points Saved %: Xu 50%, Mi 42%.

A. Xu Recent Matches Played

OPPONENTRESULTSCOREH2H
HardW15 Clemson - 10-11-2025

QF

USAB. Payne
L
6-1 2-6 6-4

R2

USAC. Tanguilig
W
7-5 5-7 6-2

R1

ESPC. Yecora
W
6-3 6-3
HardW50 Saskatoon - 11-08-2025

R1

USAS. Ewing
L
6-4 6-3
HardW75 Granby - 14-07-2025

Q1

USAA. Honer
L
6-3 6-4

L. Mi Recent Matches Played

OPPONENTRESULTSCOREH2H
ClayW35 Orlando - 03-11-2025

R1

USAL. Chang
L
6-0 5-7 6-2
HardW100 Irapuato - 27-10-2025

R1

USAU. Maitane
L
6-2 6-2

Q3

MEXF. Regalado
W
6-2 6-3
HardW15 Monastir - 13-10-2025

QF

JPNK. Nishimura
L
6-1 6-3

R2

POLA. Kmiecik
W
6-4 6-3
banner

A. Xu vs L. Mi Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents

Stats
51.02% (25/24)YTD Win/Loss58.06% (36/26)
48.65% (54/57)Sets Win/Loss57.86% (81/59)
50.37% (540/532)Games Win/Loss53.67% (665/574)
52.50% (21/19)Hard Win/Loss61.40% (35/22)
50.00% (3/3)Clay Win/Loss25.00% (1/3)
33.33% (1/2)Indoor Hard W/L0.00% (0/1)
0.1Aces Per Game0
53Aces Total2
0.42Double Faults Per Game0.09
221Total Double Faults54
1:22:2Average Match Time1:37:57
447Average Opponent Rank367.52
59% (1403/2379)1st Serve %83% (2929/3509)
62% (872/1403)1st Serve Win %52% (1520/2929)
41% (397/976)2nd Serve Win %45% (259/580)
50% (158/316)Break Points Won % (Total)51% (253/500)
48% (1121/2351)Return Points Win %49% (1802/3672)
40.00% (8/12)Challenger W/L53.13% (17/15)
58.62% (17/12)Futures W/L63.33% (19/11)
50% (24/48)Best of 3 Sets Win %57% (35/61)
0% (0/0)Best of 5 Sets Win %100% (1/1)
20% (1/5)Tiebreaks Win % (Total)42% (5/12)
64% (9/14)Deciding Set Win %40% (6/15)
91% (23/21)1st Set Won, Won Match89% (36/32)
9% (23/2)1st Set Won, Lost Match11% (36/4)
15% (26/4)1st Set Lost, Won Match15% (26/4)

Other Tennis Predictions Today

01:55 PM 19/11/25
Prediction
GBRJ. Clarke1
KAZD. Yevseyev
W1
1.43
W2
2.58
08:00 PM 19/11/25
Prediction
LIBH. Habib3
URUJ. A. CardozoALT
W1
1.41
W2
2.64
05:30 PM 19/11/25
Prediction
BRAE. RibeiroALT
BRAP. B. Dias
W1
2.55
W2
1.44
04:00 PM 20/11/25
Prediction
ARGJ. B. Torres
BRAD. D. D. Silva
W1
1.62
W2
2.13
02:00 AM 20/11/25
Prediction
AUSJ. M. Kubler4
CZEM. Gengel
W1
1.54
W2
2.28
12:30 PM 20/11/25
Prediction
ESPD. M. Aguilar4
ITAG. Piraino
W1
1.31
W2
3.08